The Gay Pride Parade Marches On (sadly)

California has decided to become the second state in our formerly wonderful Union to condone the marriage of same-sex couples.
The Associated Press released an article going over it in gruesome detail, viewable here.

Dozens of people "rushed to the altar" to seal an agreement that "they were already married in their minds and hearts," but have never "been able to have experience of community and common humanity."

What?

"Common Humanity?" What in the world is THAT supposed to mean? If they were married in their minds and hearts already, then why do they want to change their status in the eyes of the law? Seriously. In spite of the example of two old lesbo biddies, who've purportedly been together for over 50 years, homosexual relationships rarely last.
Sorry people. It's a fact. Gay people change their partners frequently, and many of them became fruitcakes for the express purpose of proving that they were no chained down and free to do as they please. Soooo.... how does marriage fit into that "Nothing Holds Me Back" attitude?

Divorce rates are already sky high, and half the kids you meet come from either a broken home, or one without their original mother or father. Whether liberal pop culture wants to admit it, or even whether the child wants to admit it, broken homes have significant effect on a child's mental being. I'm no saying they go "mental" or "nuts," but that it affects how they develop and think, and the effects are rarely positive.

What does this have to do with gay people getting married? Well, believe it or not, these fruits want to have CHILDREN! Whoops! Surprise, they can't, so they want to adopt them. First off, imagine how the kid must feel.
"Swell, I'm being adopted by a couple of flakes."
Oh, wait, I forgot, liberal brain-washing education techniques will have those "nasty, hateful, ignorant, politically correct" thoughts expelled from their minds before much time passes.
(Think I'm kidding? Kaliforniastan already teaches first graders to celebrate gay pride days.)
Second, in the ideal environment, a child should have both strong male and female figures in their life. A mother teaches her son how to be compassionate, caring, and gentle. A father teaches his son how to be a man, how to compete, work, struggle, and win. Too much of one, and none of the other is going to produce weird people.
So with that in mind, if your have TWO father figures, or perhaps one or both don't act like men, the child is going to be seriously confused and warped.
Same thing with two mothers.
Long story short, gay people should not be allowed to adopt children for the simple fact that by doing so, the child's development will be seriously screwed up.

Now, our culture is doing everything in it's power to deny this, but the most basic unit of society is the family. Society, government, culture, and more don't exist until the family level. Two people in love, living together, are not a family. There is no society or culture, just two people fulfilling their desires. There is no semblance of government. Only two people engaging in a battle of wills to see who's will will be instated. One person is nothing. No culture. No government. A family is where things begin. There is the ruler and justice keeper: the father. There is the administrator, adviser, and caregiver: the mother. And finally there are the undetermined number of often troublesome subjects who, given proper guidance, can work with the family, and eventually start their own: Children. (or maybe a dog/cat.)
Now, the roles have sometimes been reversed, the mother taking charge, or in some case, the child decides what is done, but no matter how many liberals or femme-nazis hate it, THAT is the basic structure of a family, which, in turn, in the basic unit of society.
The gay movement is destroying the most basic unit of society, and when you destroy the basic unit of something, it will crumble. Condoned homosexuality will open the doors for a flood of other, even more immoral requests.
I'm blowing hot air?

Well, if two man are allowed to have sex, and then maybe get married, then why not make incest legal? Or maybe pedophilia? That's different you say? Sorry friend, it's not. It is considered morally wrong to lie with a man as one does with a woman. Same applies for those other two things I mentioned. Gay people have been trying to get rid of those silly morals for the longest time, but once they do, everything falls apart. They want to smash the wall, because it is big, mean, ugly, and holds them back. However, they forget that the wall was put there for a reason.

Once morals have been abolished, everything is game. Sure, you can arbitraraly decide when it's gone too far, but even the best stop-gap in temporary. Soon you'll have other groups of people asking: "Hey! If they get THEIR way, why can't I!?!"
Incest, Pedophilia, rape, cannibalism, sado-masochism. It can all become VERY real, and very legal. And the odds are pretty good that it will start in California.

I don't care how mean it seems to keep them in there. The flies of chaos were locked inside Pandora's Box for a good reason. Try to let one out, and they all escape.