Have you heard of the "numerous scandals surrounding McCain's inexperienced, hypocritical choice for vp?"
Of course you have. Why? Because EVERY SINGLE LIBERAL NEWS OUTLET WON'T LET IT DIE!
The "Numerous Scandals?"
Two.
1: She supposedly fired a state trooper out of vengeance, and possibly illegally.
2: Her teenage daughter is pregnant.
2 1/2: Did her daughter give birth to baby Trig as well?
Alright you democratic morons. Lets put something to rest right now. Let's tackle the whole "teen pregnancy" thing, because "scandal #1," is under investigation, and I'm going to wait for Palin to be vindicated of her own accord.
Remember. The people who are jumping all over this are the same people who jumped all over the possibility of Hannah Montana being pregnant. Immature leeches willing to sell their souls to teen pop gossip magazines. In other words, the whole thing was childish to begin with. People accuse Sarah Palin of being a hypocrite. She preaches abstinence, but (gasp) her own daughter's pregnant! Crucify her! Crucify her!
Remember Cindy Sheehan? The wackjob peacenick? Am I mistaken, or was not her son a soldier? "But that's not fair! She became a pacifist AFTER her son was killed! She preaches what she does because she doesn't want to happen to anyone else!"
So why isn't Sarah Palin allowed to do that? Ever consider that, even if this incident did NOT start her abstinence crusade, it still cements it. How? Consider it. Turn on your brain. She knows the pain, problems, dissapointment, and harrasment that comes from having sex and getting pregnant out of wedlock, and is going through it personally. Why on Earth would she wish that kind of trouble on someone else?
Now, as for rumor 2 1/2.... Grow up people. Liberal conspiracy theorists have decided that since, aside from a whopping huge number of TWO scandals they've been able to find, they have nothing, and are gonna have to make something up.
Bristol's pregnant? Her mom has a small child? What's the first thing that pops into your head?
The first thing that popped into mine was: "They can play together when they get older."
Seriously. A couple having a child late in their marriage is not uncommon. My great grandparents had a late arrival, my great aunt is only a few years older than my father. So what? But no.... in the liberal media's eye: "Bristol's pregnant! Her mom has a four month old baby! BRISTOL GAVE BIRTH TO TRIG!"
Whut? How in the world do you reach THAT conclusion? Helloooooo! For those of you who failed biology the average human gestation period is NINE MONTHS! Trig is four months old. Bristol is five months pregnant. It doesn't add up. How in the world would she get pregnant again, a month before Trig was born, if she was Trig's birthmother? It doesn't work.
So now what? The media's plan is ruined... but wait! I know! Those evil Republicans have photoshopped all the pictures of Palin and Bristol to fit their stories, and they are making Bristol wear a beach ball underneath her clothes... oh, they're sneaky, those Republicans.
Give me a break.
No matter what liberals tell you, Republicans are so dumb that they would cover up a pregnancy scandal... with another pregnancy scandal. Why? There is no point, but that's what many liberal bloggers are saying. McCain is faking Bristol's current pregnancy so no one knows about her giving birth to Trig. What? Why? There's no point, no advantage, no nothing. More smoke.
"We have proof," they say. Some bloggers have noticed that Bristol was out of school for 5 months with mononucleosis (mono), a disease that induces extreme lethargia among other things, limiting movement. Some claim it's another cover by Palin, saying mono doesn't last more than 10 days. Not true. A normal infection with mono usually results in severe symptoms for about 2 weeks, a sever lethargia and fatigue for 1-2 months. Bristol's case was a sever one. My own mother had a sever case of mono as a child, and was bedridden for over 6 months.
Long story short, Democrat bloggers, liberal leaning media, and idiots on YouTube are full of bullcrap.
Bristol deserves my apology for speaking about her delicate situation, and I do not mean to belittle her. She will be marrying the father, and if the media will leave her alone, life should continue normally for her.
Showing posts with label John McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John McCain. Show all posts
Monday, September 1, 2008
Saturday, August 30, 2008
The Democrat's Broken Record.
I'm not sure what annoys me more about this campaign. The lack of good choice, or the sheer, monotonous repetition of material. Seriously people, it's getting boring. If I were voting solely based on who was more interesting, I'd have to go with McCain, because at least his ads are funny.
McCain is old enough to have hunted dinosaurs in his younger years.
Barack is black and has no idea what he's doing.
ALL I EVER HEAR ARE THESE TWO ARGUMENTS!!! I'm sick and tired of it! If you're going to bash each other, at least be creative! I watched the Democratic National Convention, and felt like killing myself. Not because of the crazy ideas, but because I can only handle so many hours, of so many speakers... ALL SAYING THE EXACT SAME FREAKIN' THING!
"Obama loves us, but McCain is going to kill our nation. Obama will save us, but McCain will kill our nation. Obama is for the people, but McCain hates all life as we know it. Obama loves us, but McCain doesn't care about people who don't have jobs. Obama will save us, but McCain will kill our nation. Obama is for the people, but McCain will kill our nation."
They went on and on and on and on like that... FOR HOURS! Every single person said the exact same thing! The ONLY interesting speeches came from Bill Richardson and Al Gore. Bill's because he occasionaly would start babbling in Spanish for no apparent reason, and Gore's because he spent the first 15 minutes whinging about his unfair loss back in 2000. Annoying, but it was a welcome refreshment from the same, boring, idiotic droning that predominated the convention.
Barack Obama has been brainwashing his supporters with the same drivel, given them the same scripts, and they are all militantly marching to his drum. I'm not being paranoid when I compare this to the rise of Hitler. Do some SERIOUS research on how the man came to power. Both Barack and Adolf are incredible speech makers. Both deliver moving speeches... without actually saying anything. Both inspired masses to follow them blindly, expecting to cash in on empty promises of hope, prosperity, and wealth for all. Both were elevated to an almost god-like status.
Anthems were sung about Hitler.
Obama's speeches were put to music, and artists sung his praise.
Obama's threat to our nation isn't just conservative yammering, trying to score a victory for our side. We have no side in this race. McCain is a centrist, one who walks down the middle, but quite frankly, he is the better choice right now.
This isn't paranoia you're hearing. It is fear.
McCain is old enough to have hunted dinosaurs in his younger years.
Barack is black and has no idea what he's doing.
ALL I EVER HEAR ARE THESE TWO ARGUMENTS!!! I'm sick and tired of it! If you're going to bash each other, at least be creative! I watched the Democratic National Convention, and felt like killing myself. Not because of the crazy ideas, but because I can only handle so many hours, of so many speakers... ALL SAYING THE EXACT SAME FREAKIN' THING!
"Obama loves us, but McCain is going to kill our nation. Obama will save us, but McCain will kill our nation. Obama is for the people, but McCain hates all life as we know it. Obama loves us, but McCain doesn't care about people who don't have jobs. Obama will save us, but McCain will kill our nation. Obama is for the people, but McCain will kill our nation."
They went on and on and on and on like that... FOR HOURS! Every single person said the exact same thing! The ONLY interesting speeches came from Bill Richardson and Al Gore. Bill's because he occasionaly would start babbling in Spanish for no apparent reason, and Gore's because he spent the first 15 minutes whinging about his unfair loss back in 2000. Annoying, but it was a welcome refreshment from the same, boring, idiotic droning that predominated the convention.
Barack Obama has been brainwashing his supporters with the same drivel, given them the same scripts, and they are all militantly marching to his drum. I'm not being paranoid when I compare this to the rise of Hitler. Do some SERIOUS research on how the man came to power. Both Barack and Adolf are incredible speech makers. Both deliver moving speeches... without actually saying anything. Both inspired masses to follow them blindly, expecting to cash in on empty promises of hope, prosperity, and wealth for all. Both were elevated to an almost god-like status.
Anthems were sung about Hitler.
Obama's speeches were put to music, and artists sung his praise.
Obama's threat to our nation isn't just conservative yammering, trying to score a victory for our side. We have no side in this race. McCain is a centrist, one who walks down the middle, but quite frankly, he is the better choice right now.
This isn't paranoia you're hearing. It is fear.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Biden? Why Biden?
Obama is falling in the polls. Even liberal newspapers are being forced to admit it. Why? Because people are finally getting sick of Obama talking about change, while never actually saying anything. More and more, the facts of what he really plans for this country are coming to light, and people don't like it.
Obama is the ultimate liberal. He believes everything liberals do. He endorses gay marriage. He's in favor of higher taxes. He wants to take away all privately owned guns and ammunition. He is so pro-abortion, that he want to kill babies after they're out of the womb. I'm serious. He believes that if a child is born before the abortion was fully engaged, or if the child somehow survived the abortion, they should be killed anyway.
Obama is also struggling with his image. Thanks to the internet, his "exploits," (ignoring the troops, making huge blunders in his statements, etc) have been brought into the light. Obama has all the appearances of a political genious, but that's all it is. Appearance.
So, with all of this dragging him down.... Why on earth does he pick Joe Biden as a VP!?! It makes no sense. The only advantage is that Biden isn't going to try and kill Barack for the presidency. (Like some speculate Hillary would.)
In spite of what all the news outlets say, Biden is NOTHING spectacular. Heck, he isn't even that interesting. He's just a typical, rank and file, liberal Democrat. What? Is Obama trying to make sure that his victory in Delaware is assured? That state is a deep shade of navy blue. Obama doesn't have to worry.
So... Obama has made an idiotic choice for VP. He choice will neither garner him more votes, or really boost his polls. So why did he do it?
If McCain was smart, he would pick a strong conservative like Romney, or Thompson, or someone he ran against as VP, to solidify his base with the Republicans. My only hope is that McCain doesn't make a huge blunder with HIS VP selection too.
Obama is the ultimate liberal. He believes everything liberals do. He endorses gay marriage. He's in favor of higher taxes. He wants to take away all privately owned guns and ammunition. He is so pro-abortion, that he want to kill babies after they're out of the womb. I'm serious. He believes that if a child is born before the abortion was fully engaged, or if the child somehow survived the abortion, they should be killed anyway.
Obama is also struggling with his image. Thanks to the internet, his "exploits," (ignoring the troops, making huge blunders in his statements, etc) have been brought into the light. Obama has all the appearances of a political genious, but that's all it is. Appearance.
So, with all of this dragging him down.... Why on earth does he pick Joe Biden as a VP!?! It makes no sense. The only advantage is that Biden isn't going to try and kill Barack for the presidency. (Like some speculate Hillary would.)
In spite of what all the news outlets say, Biden is NOTHING spectacular. Heck, he isn't even that interesting. He's just a typical, rank and file, liberal Democrat. What? Is Obama trying to make sure that his victory in Delaware is assured? That state is a deep shade of navy blue. Obama doesn't have to worry.
So... Obama has made an idiotic choice for VP. He choice will neither garner him more votes, or really boost his polls. So why did he do it?
If McCain was smart, he would pick a strong conservative like Romney, or Thompson, or someone he ran against as VP, to solidify his base with the Republicans. My only hope is that McCain doesn't make a huge blunder with HIS VP selection too.
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Clinton's mixed messages.
Hillary Clinton, in this article, claims to be behind Obama 100%, and encourages her followers to vote for him and not McCain.
Why the sudden friendliness?
Is it because Obama paid a fraction of her enormous campaign debt?
Does she really hate McCain that much?
Is she hoping for a shot at vice-president?
What is it?
You see, I'm confused. Unless I'm mistaken, did not Hillary Clinton call for an open vote in the convention, between herself and the Chosen One (Barack)? Lets face it. No matter how many publicity pieces these jokers do, EVERYONE knows they don't like each other, and as long as Hillary has been active, she has never surrendered willingly.
Between McCain's ignorance and stupidity, Barack's smooth talking drivel, and Hillary's obvious scheming, I'm both worried, and intrigued by how things are going to pan out by September.
Why the sudden friendliness?
Is it because Obama paid a fraction of her enormous campaign debt?
Does she really hate McCain that much?
Is she hoping for a shot at vice-president?
What is it?
You see, I'm confused. Unless I'm mistaken, did not Hillary Clinton call for an open vote in the convention, between herself and the Chosen One (Barack)? Lets face it. No matter how many publicity pieces these jokers do, EVERYONE knows they don't like each other, and as long as Hillary has been active, she has never surrendered willingly.
Between McCain's ignorance and stupidity, Barack's smooth talking drivel, and Hillary's obvious scheming, I'm both worried, and intrigued by how things are going to pan out by September.
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Wait.... What?
Watch this video, and about two thirds of the way through, cover any younger kids ears, as there is one swear word.
wait for it.....
wait for it.....
Ok, there. My brain just imploded. Why? Lets see. Who was that on screen? Paris Hilton. What is Paris Hilton known for? Stupid stunts and an out of control life style. What did she just say?
Probably the smartest thing ANYONE has said about energy in the past two years. Paris said that? Really?
*pop*
Dang, my brain imploded again.
McCain, Obama, you just got owned.
Explain to me why the blond poster girl has been able to out think you both. Seriously guys, it's sad. you're running for president, SHE is planning a vacation, yet she still seems smarter that both of you put together.
You know what? Personally, I'm in favor of off-shore drilling, continental drilling, and drilling just about everywhere where we have oil. However, I'm not against new energy technology, as long as it performs well, which the current energy tech does not. Correction. SOME of it does, but the few that CAN perform as well as a combustion engine, are CRAZY expensive, so just making everyone drive electric poop shooters is NOT a good plan, and the odds are pretty good we'll be driving gas for a while, so we might as well get used to it.
Now, I'm not sure if I approve of environmental regulations, but even WITH that in there, it is STILL one of the smartest things I've heard.
I do back McCain's drilling plan, but lets face it. The Greenie Weenies will never let it get by.
Also, if her smart moment is as smart as it sounds, then by tax incentives, she means tax cuts for plants making hybrids.
(rule#1 of energy production. If cost of energy is too high, then don't tax it, because that makes it higher. Democrats failed that course.... over and over and over again.)
Final verdict? Considering our options.... letting Paris paint the White House pink, may not be such a bad idea. And hey, she can never top JFK and Bill Clinton in terms of scandal, and after 8 years of Bush, she can make all the grammar errors she wants.
wait for it.....
wait for it.....
Ok, there. My brain just imploded. Why? Lets see. Who was that on screen? Paris Hilton. What is Paris Hilton known for? Stupid stunts and an out of control life style. What did she just say?
Probably the smartest thing ANYONE has said about energy in the past two years. Paris said that? Really?
*pop*
Dang, my brain imploded again.
McCain, Obama, you just got owned.
Explain to me why the blond poster girl has been able to out think you both. Seriously guys, it's sad. you're running for president, SHE is planning a vacation, yet she still seems smarter that both of you put together.
You know what? Personally, I'm in favor of off-shore drilling, continental drilling, and drilling just about everywhere where we have oil. However, I'm not against new energy technology, as long as it performs well, which the current energy tech does not. Correction. SOME of it does, but the few that CAN perform as well as a combustion engine, are CRAZY expensive, so just making everyone drive electric poop shooters is NOT a good plan, and the odds are pretty good we'll be driving gas for a while, so we might as well get used to it.
Now, I'm not sure if I approve of environmental regulations, but even WITH that in there, it is STILL one of the smartest things I've heard.
I do back McCain's drilling plan, but lets face it. The Greenie Weenies will never let it get by.
Also, if her smart moment is as smart as it sounds, then by tax incentives, she means tax cuts for plants making hybrids.
(rule#1 of energy production. If cost of energy is too high, then don't tax it, because that makes it higher. Democrats failed that course.... over and over and over again.)
Final verdict? Considering our options.... letting Paris paint the White House pink, may not be such a bad idea. And hey, she can never top JFK and Bill Clinton in terms of scandal, and after 8 years of Bush, she can make all the grammar errors she wants.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
energy,
John McCain,
Paris Hilton
Monday, June 9, 2008
Obama gets the Nod
Ol' Obama wins, Hillary loses. What does this mean for the rest of us?
In short.... we're screwed.
Of the two Democrats fiercely duking it out for the nomination, Hillary was the more conservative of the two. (Yes, I KNOW that sounds weird, but it's true.)
Why did Obama get a free ride from the press? Because any kind of negative comments could be billed as racism. Obama claims to be running to try and break those barriers, but instead, Obama just proves how alive racism is. If there was no racism in our country, we would not be afraid to criticize Obama, because his skin color wouldn't matter. However, when negative comments are given the title of "prejudice," then it just proves my point. Obama has used his minority status to try and get the American people to vote for him out of guilt.
Why?
Well, we thought our country was entering a "new age" of enlightenment and acceptance, and if we don't elect Obama, then obviously our nation is not truely open-mined or educated.
(I'm being sarcastic.)
Obama is getting a free ticket in and I don't know why.
For the record, I am not racist, but the sheer fact that I have to explain that I am not shows how deep the liberal brain-washing tendrils have gone. If Condi ran, I would vote for her. If Alan Keyes ran again, I would vote for him, but Obama is too much of a wacko liberal racist for me to even tolerate.
McCain? The guy is a closet Dem and everyone knows it. He is less liberal than Obama, but... it isn't much of a lead. He'll do whatever pleases whoever's around him. He has no backbone, and supports the tracking chip. (The one that is implanted in your arm,) Who know what other crazed ideas he has, BESIDES amnesty for illegals. His stance on important issues changes constantly, and overall, he would be a poor leader.
The final analysis?
We have ONE canidate trying to coast to victory on the fact that he is a minority, and to show our lack of prejudice, we should vote for him.
We have ANOTHER candidate tryong to coast to victory on his record in the military. (Which, considered he was SHOT DOWN and CAPTURED, isn't all that great.)
The press gave them both free passes, and for us conservatives, it appears we're screwed.
(Personally, I think I'll be pulling for Bob Barr now.)
In short.... we're screwed.
Of the two Democrats fiercely duking it out for the nomination, Hillary was the more conservative of the two. (Yes, I KNOW that sounds weird, but it's true.)
Why did Obama get a free ride from the press? Because any kind of negative comments could be billed as racism. Obama claims to be running to try and break those barriers, but instead, Obama just proves how alive racism is. If there was no racism in our country, we would not be afraid to criticize Obama, because his skin color wouldn't matter. However, when negative comments are given the title of "prejudice," then it just proves my point. Obama has used his minority status to try and get the American people to vote for him out of guilt.
Why?
Well, we thought our country was entering a "new age" of enlightenment and acceptance, and if we don't elect Obama, then obviously our nation is not truely open-mined or educated.
(I'm being sarcastic.)
Obama is getting a free ticket in and I don't know why.
For the record, I am not racist, but the sheer fact that I have to explain that I am not shows how deep the liberal brain-washing tendrils have gone. If Condi ran, I would vote for her. If Alan Keyes ran again, I would vote for him, but Obama is too much of a wacko liberal racist for me to even tolerate.
McCain? The guy is a closet Dem and everyone knows it. He is less liberal than Obama, but... it isn't much of a lead. He'll do whatever pleases whoever's around him. He has no backbone, and supports the tracking chip. (The one that is implanted in your arm,) Who know what other crazed ideas he has, BESIDES amnesty for illegals. His stance on important issues changes constantly, and overall, he would be a poor leader.
The final analysis?
We have ONE canidate trying to coast to victory on the fact that he is a minority, and to show our lack of prejudice, we should vote for him.
We have ANOTHER candidate tryong to coast to victory on his record in the military. (Which, considered he was SHOT DOWN and CAPTURED, isn't all that great.)
The press gave them both free passes, and for us conservatives, it appears we're screwed.
(Personally, I think I'll be pulling for Bob Barr now.)
Labels:
Barack Obama,
election,
Hillary Clinton,
John McCain,
president
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
